Sunday, September 18, 2016
Sunday, July 10, 2016
Sunday, July 03, 2016
Monday, June 27, 2016
Saturday, May 21, 2016
Monday, May 09, 2016
Sunday, May 08, 2016
Saturday, May 07, 2016
Saturday, March 05, 2016
Sunday, April 06, 2014
Seiko LandMaster セイコープロスペックス SBDB005
セイコープロスペックス SBDB005
スプリングドライブ キャリバーNo.5R66
ケースコーティング
ダイヤシールド
ガラス材質
サファイアガラス
ガラスコーティング
スーパークリア コーティング
ルミブライト
あり(針・インデックス)
精度平均月差±15秒(日差±1秒相当)
防水(10気圧)
耐磁
サイズ 縦49.40mm×横46.70mm×厚さ14.20mm
重さ140g
その他特徴
スクリューバック
ねじロック式りゅうず
耐メタルアレルギー
ケース裏部パーソナルデータ刻印可能
ダブルロック中留
24時針(デュアルタイム表示機能)
カレンダー連動時差修正機能
石数 30石
秒針停止機能
パワーリザーブ表示機能
350,000円
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Monday, October 12, 2009
Lantau Peak
Jesse Owens
Aka: Phoenix Mountain
GPS: N22.249769° E113.921303°
Elevation: 934m
Free map from Lands Department
Thursday, August 28, 2008
Notes on Zeiss Distagon T* 28mm f/2.0 ZF & Nikkor 45mm f/2.8 P
Zeiss Distagon T* 28mm f/2.0 ZF
f/2.8 Center 80% of frame is very sharp.
Slight peripheral softness.
f/4.0 as sharp as any Nikkor can get.
f/8.0 sets the perfect golden standard.
Nikkor 45mm f/2.8 P
f/2.8
60% of the center frame is already rendered quite sharply.
However the extreme left and right frame is soft.
Peripheral softness is visible.
f/4
Strangely the four corners are distinctively soft.
Whereas the center of the frame is very sharp.
Acceptable portraits at f/4.0, maybe.
Must position subject in center of the frame.
f/8.0
This lens is almost totally primed.
The entire frame is extremely sharp.
Large improvement on the peripheral sharpness over f/2.8.
Good enough for landscape photography.
Near Zeiss performance.
f/2.8 Center 80% of frame is very sharp.
Slight peripheral softness.
f/4.0 as sharp as any Nikkor can get.
f/8.0 sets the perfect golden standard.
Nikkor 45mm f/2.8 P
f/2.8
60% of the center frame is already rendered quite sharply.
However the extreme left and right frame is soft.
Peripheral softness is visible.
f/4
Strangely the four corners are distinctively soft.
Whereas the center of the frame is very sharp.
Acceptable portraits at f/4.0, maybe.
Must position subject in center of the frame.
f/8.0
This lens is almost totally primed.
The entire frame is extremely sharp.
Large improvement on the peripheral sharpness over f/2.8.
Good enough for landscape photography.
Near Zeiss performance.
Monday, January 15, 2007
Tuesday, January 02, 2007
Sunday, December 31, 2006
Saturday, December 30, 2006
Friday, December 29, 2006
Tuesday, December 26, 2006
smc Pentax 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL
Monday, December 25, 2006
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
Why use older mechanical cameras?
Photographers are equipment lovers, connoisseurs of mechanical minutiae, aficionados of quality lenses, appreciators of fine design. Some cameras and lenses simply "speak to us": something visceral happens when we hold them and use them.
I personally think this visceral hit occurs more often with older cameras. There is something in the heft and feel of older, mechanical cameras that is missing from many of the newer polycarbonate models. Some of these new cameras are superb instruments, to be sure, and are just what the professional needs, but they don't bring the same aesthetic to the table. Call it "design as art form" or even "form follows function", many older cameras are beautiful machines you can enjoy and savor over and over again. Some are not so beautiful, but have a scruffy personality that makes them endearing. And they still take good pictures. And they're cheap (Leicas being a notable exception). So in addition to being a literal description, "Old Beater" is also a term of affection and endearment. If the term bothers you, you can use the more upscale term "Heritage Camera", but "Old Beater" suits me fine.
So, hats off to the fine cameras of yesteryear! Keep 'em snapping and keep 'em alive! Salut!
I personally think this visceral hit occurs more often with older cameras. There is something in the heft and feel of older, mechanical cameras that is missing from many of the newer polycarbonate models. Some of these new cameras are superb instruments, to be sure, and are just what the professional needs, but they don't bring the same aesthetic to the table. Call it "design as art form" or even "form follows function", many older cameras are beautiful machines you can enjoy and savor over and over again. Some are not so beautiful, but have a scruffy personality that makes them endearing. And they still take good pictures. And they're cheap (Leicas being a notable exception). So in addition to being a literal description, "Old Beater" is also a term of affection and endearment. If the term bothers you, you can use the more upscale term "Heritage Camera", but "Old Beater" suits me fine.
So, hats off to the fine cameras of yesteryear! Keep 'em snapping and keep 'em alive! Salut!
Saturday, November 25, 2006
Monday, November 20, 2006
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















































